Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C vs Teff, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100 g.
Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C
34 kcal
Teff, cooked
101 kcal
Calories
34 kcal
101 kcal
Protein
0.7 g
3.9 g
Carbs
7.1 g
19.9 g
Fiber
2.3 g
2.8 g
Sugars
0.0 g
~
Fat
0.4 g
0.7 g
Sodium
10 mg
8 mg
Key takeaways
- Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C has 66% fewer calories (34 kcal vs 101 kcal).
- Teff, cooked has more protein (3.9 g vs 0.7 g).
- Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C has more carbs (7.1 g vs 19.9 g).
- Teff, cooked has more fiber (2.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C has more fat (0.4 g vs 0.7 g).
| Macronutrients | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 34 kcal | 101 kcal |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Total Fat | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Total Carbohydrate | 7.1 g | 19.9 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Total Sugars | 0.0 g | ~ |
| Water | 91.4 g | 74.9 g |
| Carbohydrates | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Total Carbohydrate | 7.1 g | 19.9 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Starch | 3.7 g | ~ |
| Total Sugars | 0.0 g | ~ |
| Fats & Fatty Acids | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.0 g | ~ |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.0 g | ~ |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 0.0 g | ~ |
| Omega-3 Fatty Acids | 6.0 mg | ~ |
| Omega-6 Fatty Acids | 43.0 mg | ~ |
| Protein & Amino Acids | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 0.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Histidine | ~ | 88.0 mg |
| Isoleucine | ~ | 146.0 mg |
| Leucine | ~ | 311.0 mg |
| Lysine | ~ | 109.0 mg |
| Methionine | ~ | 125.0 mg |
| Phenylalanine | ~ | 203.0 mg |
| Threonine | ~ | 149.0 mg |
| Tryptophan | ~ | 41.0 mg |
| Valine | ~ | 200.0 mg |
| Alanine | ~ | 218.0 mg |
| Arginine | ~ | 151.0 mg |
| Aspartic Acid | ~ | 239.0 mg |
| Cystine | ~ | 69.0 mg |
| Glutamic Acid | ~ | 975.0 mg |
| Glycine | ~ | 139.0 mg |
| Proline | ~ | 193.0 mg |
| Serine | ~ | 181.0 mg |
| Tyrosine | ~ | 133.0 mg |
| Vitamins | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A (RAE) | ~ | 0.0 mcg |
| Vitamin E | 0.4 mg | ~ |
| Thiamin (B1) | 0.0 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 0.0 mg | 0.0 mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 0.3 mg | 0.9 mg |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.1 mg | 0.1 mg |
| Folate (B9) | 5.0 mcg | 18.0 mcg |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.0 mcg | 0.0 mcg |
| Pantothenic Acid (B5) | 0.1 mg | ~ |
| Minerals | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Calcium | 23.0 mg | 49.0 mg |
| Iron | 1.2 mg | 2.1 mg |
| Magnesium | 3.0 mg | 50.0 mg |
| Phosphorus | 13.0 mg | 120.0 mg |
| Potassium | 187.0 mg | 107.0 mg |
| Sodium | 10.0 mg | 8.0 mg |
| Zinc | 0.3 mg | 1.1 mg |
| Copper | 0.0 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Manganese | 1.0 mg | 2.9 mg |
| Selenium | 0.0 mcg | ~ |
| Sterols | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol | 0.0 mg | 0.0 mg |
| Campesterol | 0.0 mg | ~ |
| Stigmasterol | 1.0 mg | ~ |
| Beta-sitosterol | 10.0 mg | ~ |
| Other | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C | Teff, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Alcohol | 0.0 g | ~ |
| Caffeine | 0.0 mg | ~ |
| Theobromine | 0.0 mg | ~ |
| Ash | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
Frequently asked questions
Which has fewer calories, Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C or Teff, cooked?
Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C has fewer calories: 34 kcal for Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C vs 101 kcal for Teff, cooked per 100 g.
Which has more protein, Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C or Teff, cooked?
Teff, cooked has more protein: 0.7 g for Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C vs 3.9 g for Teff, cooked per 100 g.
Which has more fiber, Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C or Teff, cooked?
Teff, cooked has more fiber: 2.3 g for Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C vs 2.8 g for Teff, cooked per 100 g.
Is Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C or Teff, cooked healthier?
Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, Yellow pond lily, Nuphar lutea, rhizome (OR) - CY0617C is lower in calories, and Teff, cooked is higher in protein. The healthier choice depends on your goals — compare the full breakdown above to decide.